Implementing mathematics with the Nuprl proof development system
Implementing mathematics with the Nuprl proof development system
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS)
Adapting Proofs-as-Programs: The Curry-Howard Protocol (Monographs in Computer Science)
Adapting Proofs-as-Programs: The Curry-Howard Protocol (Monographs in Computer Science)
A type theoretic framework for formal metamodelling
Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Architecting Systems with Trustworthy Components
Separation of Concerns and Consistent Integration in Requirements Modelling
SOFSEM '07 Proceedings of the 33rd conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science
Design of Complex Cyber Physical Systems with Formalized Architectural Patterns
Software-Intensive Systems and New Computing Paradigms
A Formal Foundation for Metamodeling
Ada-Europe '09 Proceedings of the 14th Ada-Europe International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies
An algebraic semantics for MOF
FASE'08/ETAPS'08 Proceedings of the Theory and practice of software, 11th international conference on Fundamental approaches to software engineering
An institution theory of formal meta-modelling in graphically extended BNF
Frontiers of Computer Science in China
Embedding domain-specific modelling languages in Maude specifications
Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The Object Managment Group's Meta-Object Facility (MOF) [9] is a semiformal approach to writing models and metamodels (models of models). The MOF was developed to enable systematic model/metamodel interchange and integration. The approach is problematic, unless metamodels are correctly specified: an error in a metamodel specification will propagate throughout instantiating models and final model implementations. An important open question is how to develop provably correct metamodels. This paper outlines a solution to the question, in which the MOF meta-modelling approach is formalized within constructive type theory.