GPS-based geographic addressing, routing, and resource discovery
Communications of the ACM
The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Multicast operation of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Flooding-based geocasting protocols for mobile ad hoc networks
Mobile Networks and Applications
Mesh-based Geocast Routing Protocols in an Ad Hoc Network
IPDPS '01 Proceedings of the 15th International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium
An adaptive mesh-based protocol for geocast routing
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing - Special issue on Routing in mobile and wireless ad hoc networks
Geocasting in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Location-Based Multicast Algorithms
WMCSA '99 Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications
GeoTORA: a protocol for geocasting in mobile ad hoc networks
ICNP '00 Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Network Protocols
Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Reliable dual-path geocasting for tactical ad hoc networks
MILCOM'09 Proceedings of the 28th IEEE conference on Military communications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Geocasting, a variant of conventional multicasting, uses the location technology to deliver messages. However, recent geocast protocols extensively use flooding and broadcasting approaches. When network load is heavy, the chance of collision will be increased and then packets will probably be damaged or lost. The purpose of this paper is to propose an Adaptive Handshaking-Based Geocasting protocol (AHBG). In this protocol, we employ handshaking-based forwarding for data transmission instead of flooding. Simulation results show that AHBG achieves high delivery ratio (nearly 100%) with low overhead (at least 21% reduction compared with other protocols).