On the use of multiple hops in next generation wireless systems

  • Authors:

  • B. S. Manoj;K. J. Kumar;Christo Frank D.;C. Siva Ram Murthy

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA;Department of Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley, CA;Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, IL;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA

  • Venue:
  • Wireless Networks
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Traditional cellular networks provide a centralized wireless networking paradigm within the wireless domain with the help of fixed infrastructure nodes such as Base Stations (BSs). On the other hand, Ad hoc wireless networks provide a fully distributed wireless networking scheme with no dependency on fixed infrastructure nodes. Recent studies show that the use of multihop wireless relaying in the presence of infrastructure based nodes improves system capacity of wireless networks. In this paper, we consider three recent wireless network architectures that combine the multihop relaying with infrastructure support - namely Integrated Cellular and Ad hoc Relaying (iCAR) system, Hybrid Wireless Network (HWN) architecture, and Multihop Cellular Networks (MCNs), for a detailed qualitative and quantitative performance evaluation. MCNs use multihop relaying by the Mobile Stations (MSs) controlled by the BS. iCAR uses fixed Ad hoc Relay Stations (ARSs) placed at the boundaries to relay excess traffic from a hot cell to cooler neighbor cells. HWN dynamically switches its mode of operation between a centralized Cellular mode and a distributed Ad hoc mode based on the throughput achieved. An interesting observation derived from these studies is that, none of these architectures is superior to the rest, rather each one performs better in certain conditions. MCN is found to be performing better than the other two architectures in terms of throughput, under normal traffic conditions. At very high node densities, the variable power control employed in HWN architecture is found to be having a superior impact on the throughput. The mobility of relay stations significantly influences the call dropping probability and control overhead of the system and hence at high mobility iCAR which uses fixed ARSs is found to be performing better.