The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places
QoS impact on user perception and understanding of multimedia video clips
MULTIMEDIA '98 Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Multimedia
Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications
MULTIMEDIA '98 Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Multimedia
Sharp or smooth?: comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Evaluation of subjective video quality of mobile devices
Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia
A basic multimedia quality model
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Synchronized audio redundancy coding for improved error resilience in streaming over DVB-H
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile multimedia communications
Does context matter in quality evaluation of mobile television?
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services
Objectives for new error criteria for mobile broadcasting of streaming audiovisual services
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
A user perspective of olfaction-enhanced mulsemedia
Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems
The sweet smell of success: Enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP)
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
As in many digital telecommunications systems, the received data streams over Digital Video Broadcasting for Handhelds (DVB-H) may contain bursty transmission errors. The bursty error characteristics affect the end users' perceived audiovisual quality. This study examined the perceived unacceptability of instantaneous but noticeable audio, visual and audiovisual errors. The erroneous streams were generated from four popular television contents by applying three simulated error patterns with different error rates (1.7%, 6.9%, 13.8%) and error burst durations. Instantaneous unacceptability of errors was evaluated by 30 participants with simplified continuous assessment while watching the program content. The results show that with the two lowest error rates the audio errors were more unacceptable than video errors and with the highest error rate the visual and audiovisual errors become the most unacceptable.