Model-Based Testing Service on the Web
TestCom '08 / FATES '08 Proceedings of the 20th IFIP TC 6/WG 6.1 international conference on Testing of Software and Communicating Systems: 8th International Workshop
Synthesizing Test Models from Test Cases
HVC '08 Proceedings of the 4th International Haifa Verification Conference on Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing
Choosing a test modeling language: a survey
HVC'06 Proceedings of the 2nd international Haifa verification conference on Hardware and software, verification and testing
Making model-based testing more agile: a use case driven approach
HVC'06 Proceedings of the 2nd international Haifa verification conference on Hardware and software, verification and testing
Filtering test models to support incremental testing
TAIC PART'10 Proceedings of the 5th international academic and industrial conference on Testing - practice and research techniques
Utilizing user interface models for automated instantiation and execution of system tests
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on End-to-End Test Script Engineering
Towards flexible and efficient model-based testing, utilizing domain-specific modelling
Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling
Model-based test instantiation for applications with user interfaces
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Model-based testing automating the generation of test cases is technically superior to conventional scripted testing. However, there have been difficulties in deploying the methodology in large scale industrial context. In this paper we present a domain-specific approach to model-based GUI testing that should be easier to adopt than more generic solutions. The method is based on keywords and action words that are considered as best practices in conventional GUI test automation. The basic idea is to record GUI events just like in capture/replay tools, but instead of producing scripts that can be hard to maintain, we produce sequences of keywords. These sequences are further transformed semiautomatically into Labeled Transition Systems where action words are used as transition labels. The action words model user behavior at a high level of abstraction while the keywords correspond to the GUI navigation. We also describe the associated tool set that we are developing and an example of using the approach.