Formal languages
Handbook of formal languages, vol. 2
Lindenmayer and DNA: Watson-Crick D0L systems
Current trends in theoretical computer science
Grammar Systems: A Grammatical Approach to Distribution and Cooperation
Grammar Systems: A Grammatical Approach to Distribution and Cooperation
Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics
The role of the complementarity relation in watson-crick automata and sticker systems
DLT'04 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Developments in Language Theory
Parallel communicating Watson-Crick automata systems
Acta Cybernetica
Two-party Watson-Crick computations
CIAA'10 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Implementation and application of automata
Hi-index | 5.23 |
Parallel communicating Watson-Crick automata systems were introduced in [E. Czeizler, E. Czeizler, Parallel communicating Watson-Crick automata systems, in: Z. Ésik, Z. Fülöp (Eds.), Proc. Automata and Formal Languages, Dobogókö, Hungary, 2005, pp. 83-96] as possible models of DNA computations. This combination of Watson-Crick automata and parallel communicating systems comes as a natural extension due to the new developments in DNA manipulation techniques. It is already known, see [D. Kuske, P. Weigel, The Role of the Complementarity Relation in Watson-Crick Automata and Sticker Systems, DLT 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3340, Auckland, New Zealand, 2004, pp. 272-283], that for Watson-Crick finite automata, the complementarity relation plays no active role. However, this is not the case when considering parallel communicating Watson-Crick automata systems. In this paper we prove that non-injective complementarity relations increase the accepting power of these systems. We also prove that although Watson-Crick automata are equivalent to two-head finite automata, this equivalence is not preserved when comparing parallel communicating Watson-Crick automata systems and multi-head finite automata.