Local and global analysis: complementary activities for increasing the effectiveness of requirements verification and validation

  • Authors:
  • Lester O. Lobo;James D. Arthur

  • Affiliations:
  • Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia;Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference - Volume 2
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents a unique approach to connecting requirements engineering activities into a process framework that can be employed to obtain quality requirements with reduced expenditures of effort and cost. It is well understood that early detection and correction of errors offers the greatest potential for improving requirements quality and avoiding cost overruns in the development of software systems. To realize the maximum benefits of this ideology, we propose a two-phase model that is novel in that it introduces the concept of verification and validation (V&V) early in the requirements life cycle. In the first phase, we perform V&V immediately following the elicitation of requirements for each individually distinct function of the system. Because the first phase focuses on capturing smaller sets of related requirements iteratively, each corresponding V&V activity is better focused for detecting and correcting errors in each requirement set. In the second phase, a complementary verification activity is initiated; the corresponding focus is on the quality of linkages between requirements sets rather than on the requirements within the sets. Consequently, this approach reduces the effort in verification and enhances the focus on the verification task. The second phase also addresses the business concerns collectively, and thereby produces requirements that are not only quality adherent, but are also business compliant. Our approach, unlike other models, has a minimal time delay between the elicitation of requirements and the execution of the V&V activities. Because of this short time gap, the stakeholders have a clearer recollection of the requirements, their context and rationale; this enhances the feedback during the V&V activities. Furthermore, our model includes activities that closely align with the effective requirements engineering processes employed in the software industry. Thus, our approach facilitates a better understanding of the flow of requirements, and provides guidance for the implementation of the requirements engineering process.This paper describes a well-defined, two-phase requirements engineering approach that incorporates the principles of early V&V to provide the benefits of reduced costs and enhanced quality requirements.