Report on the International Provenance and Annotation Workshop: (IPAW'06) 3-5 May 2006, Chicago

Authors:
Rajendra Bose;Ian Foster;Luc Moreau
Affiliations:
University of Edinburgh;University of Chicago;University of Southampton
Venue:
ACM SIGMOD Record
Year:
2006

Citing 0
Cited 7

Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities

Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
A Logic Programming Approach to Scientific Workflow Provenance Querying

Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes
DIPAS: A distributed performance analysis service for grid service-based workflows

Future Generation Computer Systems
Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities

Future Generation Computer Systems
Optimizing user views for workflows

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Database Theory
The Foundations for Provenance on the Web

Foundations and Trends in Web Science
Hiding data and structure in workflow provenance

DNIS'11 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Databases in Networked Information Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The provenance of a data item refers to its origins and processing history, while annotation is a term that refers to the process of adding notes or data to an existing structure. Because these terms are broad, and are used in slightly different ways by different communities, confusion is rampant. For example, consider that (1) annotating a data set with its provenance information, and (2) finding the provenance of a specific data annotation are both perfectly reasonable concepts.