Defining new argumentation-based semantics by minimal models

Authors:
Juan Carlos Nieves;Ulises Cortes;Mauricio Osorio;Ivan Olmos;Jesus A. Gonzalez
Affiliations:
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain;Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain;Universidad de las Americas - Puebla CENTIA, Mexico;Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electronica, Sta Maria Tonantzintla,Mexico,;Instituto Nacional de Astrofisica, Optica y Electronica, Sta Maria Tonantzintla,Mexico,
Venue:
ENC '06 Proceedings of the Seventh Mexican International Conference on Computer Science
Year:
2006

Citing 0
Cited 5

Preferred extensions as stable models*

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Expressing Extension-Based Semantics Based on Stratified Minimal Models

WoLLIC '09 Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Logic, Language, Information and Computation
Enhancing dung's preferred semantics

FoIKS'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems
A Schema for Generating Relevant Logic Programming Semantics and its Applications in Argumentation Theory

Fundamenta Informaticae - Logic, Language, Information and Computation
Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation

Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Dung's argumentation approach is a unifying approach which has played an influential role on argumentation research and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Based on a proper representation of Dung's argumentation approach and minimal models, we introduce a novel argumentation semantics called preferred+ semantics which follows the preferred semantics' philosophy. Also, we show how to infer preferred+ semantics using a software tool called SI-COBRA that was introduced recently.