Dispositional versus epistemic causality

  • Authors:
  • Jon Williamson

  • Affiliations:
  • Philosophy Department, SECL, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK CT2 7NF

  • Venue:
  • Minds and Machines
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

I put forward several desiderata that a philosophical theory of causality should satisfy: it should account for the objectivity of causality, it should underpin formalisms for causal reasoning, it should admit a viable epistemology, it should be able to cope with the great variety of causal claims that are made, and it should be ontologically parsimonious. I argue that Nancy Cartwright's dispositional account of causality goes part way towards meeting these criteria but is lacking in important respects. I go on to argue that my epistemic account, which ties causal relationships to an agent's knowledge and ignorance, performs well in the light of the desiderata. Such an account, I claim, is all we require from a theory of causality.