Measurement of membership functions and their acquisition
Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Special memorial volume on foundations of fuzzy reasoning
Managing subjective information in fuzzy database systems
CSC '93 Proceedings of the 1993 ACM conference on Computer science
Implementing a fuzzy relational database using community defined membership values
Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference - Volume 1
SQLf: a relational database language for fuzzy querying
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Determining an optimal membership function based on community consensus in a fuzzy database system
Proceedings of the 44th annual Southeast regional conference
Classifying 3D Human Motions by Mixing Fuzzy Gaussian Inference with Genetic Programming
ICIRA '09 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications
FUZZ-IEEE'09 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Fuzzy Systems
Recognizing 3D human motions using fuzzy quantile inference
ICIRA'10 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Intelligent robotics and applications - Volume Part I
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A fuzzy data model is able to represent ambiguities in data values as well as impreciseness in the associations among them. In these systems, imprecise information can be stored using fuzzy linguistic terms (e.g. young, big) that are used frequently in daily life. Although these words are ambiguous, community agreement can be reached as to their meaning. A Fuzzy Relational Database extends a normal relational database by adding fuzzy data and membership functions. A membership function is a mathematical function that defines the degree of an element's membership in a fuzzy set. This research aims to determine the best way of setting the membership values given feedback elicited from the community. It is proposed to construct membership values using the Direct Rating method. This approach subscribes to the point of view that fuzziness arises from subjective vagueness. The Direct Rating method is then be compared with the Random Method.