A comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and interjournal citation relations

  • Authors:
  • Ping Zhou;Loet Leydesdorff

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 15 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100038, PRC and Amsterdam School of Communications Research, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 ...;Amsterdam School of Communications Research, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The journal structure in the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database (CSTPCD) is analyzed from three perspectives: the database level, the specialty level, and the institutional level (i.e., university journals vs. journals issued by the Chinese Academy of Sciences). The results are compared with those for (Chinese) journals included in the Science Citation Index (SCI). The frequency of journal–journal citation relations in the CSTPCD is an order of magnitude lower than in the SCI. Chinese journals, especially high-quality journals, prefer to cite international journals rather than domestic ones; however, Chinese journals do not get an equivalent reception from their international counterparts. The international visibility of Chinese journals is low, but varies among fields of science. Journals of the Chinese Academy of Sciences have a better reception in the international scientific community than university journals. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.