A comparison of three algorithms for blind equalization based on the constant modulus error criterion

  • Authors:
  • T. Schirtzinger;X. Li;W. K. Jenkins

  • Affiliations:
  • Coordinated Sci. Lab., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA;Coordinated Sci. Lab., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA;Coordinated Sci. Lab., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA

  • Venue:
  • ICASSP '95 Proceedings of the Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1995. on International Conference - Volume 02
  • Year:
  • 1995

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Three constant modulus algorithms (CMA), the fast quasi-Newton CMA, the transform domain CMA, and the genetic search based CMA are proposed in this paper. The performances of these three algorithms are compared with each other via computer simulation. It is shown that the fast quasi-Newton CMA and the transform domain CMA achieve much faster convergence rate than the constant modulus algorithm based on the LMS algorithm. This fact shows that the whitening technique is not only useful but also necessary for the CMA.