Accuracy updated ensemble for data streams with concept drift
HAIS'11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Hybrid artificial intelligent systems - Volume Part II
Anomaly detection via coupled gaussian kernels
Canadian AI'12 Proceedings of the 25th Canadian conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Recentness biased learning for time series forecasting
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Mixtures of common factor analyzers for high-dimensional data with missing information
Journal of Multivariate Analysis
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Much work on skewed, stochastic, high dimensional, and biased datasets usually implicitly solve each problem separately. Recently, we have been approached by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to help them build highly accurate ozone level alarm forecasting models for the Houston area, where these technical difficulties come together in one single problem. Key characteristics of this problem that are challenging and interesting include: 1) the dataset is sparse (72 features, and 2% or 5% positives depending on the criteria of "ozone days"), 2) evolving over time from year to year, 3) limited in collected data size (7 years or around 2500 data entries), 4) contains a large number of irrelevant features, 5) is biased in terms of "sample selection bias", and 6) the true model is stochastic as a function of measurable factors. Besides solving a difficult application problem, this dataset offers a unique opportunity to explore new and existing data mining techniques, and to provide experience and guidance for similar problems. Our main technical focus addresses on how to estimate reliable probability given both sample selection bias and a large number of irrelevant features, and how to choose the most reliable decision threshold to predict the unknown future with different distribution. On the application side, the prediction accuracy of our approach is 20% higher in recall (correctly detects 1 to 3 more ozone days, depending on the year) and 10% higher in precision (15 to 30 fewer false alarm days per year) than state-of-the-art methods used by air quality control scientists, and these results are significant for TCEQ.