Theory of generalized annotated logic programming and its applications
Journal of Logic Programming
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
A Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation
AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
An Integrated Argumentation Environment for Arguing Agents
WI '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
Applying the Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation to Social Web: SNS and Wikipedia
PRIMA '08 Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Rim International Conference on Multi-Agents: Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
An integrated argumentation environment for arguing agents
KES-AMSTA'08 Proceedings of the 2nd KES International conference on Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applications
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Over the last few years, argumentation has been gaining increasing importance in multi-agent systems research. LMA is a Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation built on top of EALP (Extended Annotated Logic Programming). Araucaria is a software tool for analyzing and diagramming arguments written in natural language. We integrate these two systems involved in argumentation to an easy to use and more user-friendly argumentation system, in which natural arguments can be transformed into formal arguments, in order to lighten users' knowledge burden forced by formal argumentation frameworks, and attain extensive usability of formal argumentation systems. We illustrate the transformation process by translating natural arguments in English to formal arguments in EALP step-by-step, and then how the status of those formal arguments can be determined in LMA, resulting in the status determination of original natural arguments.