Weighing up the benefits of work: behavioral and neural analyses of effort-related decision making

  • Authors:

  • M. E. Walton;S. W. Kennerley;D. M. Bannerman;P. E. M. Phillips;M. F. S. Rushworth

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford, UK;Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA and Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford, UK;Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford, UK;Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford, UK

  • Venue:
  • Neural Networks - 2006 Special issue: Neurobiology of decision making
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

How we decide whether a course of action is worth undertaking is largely unknown. Recently, neuroscientists have been turning to ecological approaches to address this issue, examining how animals evaluate the costs and benefits of different options. We present here evidence from rodents and monkeys that demonstrate the degree to which they take into account work and energetic requirements when deciding what responses to make. These calculations appear to be critically mediated by the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathways, with damage to either causing a bias towards options that are easily obtained but yield relatively smaller reward rather than alternatives that require more work but result in greater reward. The evaluation of such decisions appears to be carried out in systems independent of those involved in delay-discounting. We suggest that top-down signals from ACC to nucleus accumbens (NAc) and/or midbrain DA cells may be vital for overcoming effort-related response costs.