Improving accuracy in word class tagging through the combination of machine learning systems
Computational Linguistics
Linguistic profiling of texts for the purpose of language verification
COLING '04 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
Author verification by linguistic profiling: An exploration of the parameter space
ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing (TSLP)
Linguistic profiling of texts for the purpose of language verification
COLING '04 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
Author identification: Using text sampling to handle the class imbalance problem
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Authorship attribution and verification with many authors and limited data
COLING '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
Particle Swarm Model Selection for Authorship Verification
CIARP '09 Proceedings of the 14th Iberoamerican Conference on Pattern Recognition: Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications
Language Resources and Evaluation
Applying biometric principles to avatar recognition
Transactions on computational science XII
N-Gram feature selection for authorship identification
AIMSA'06 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial Intelligence: methodology, Systems, and Applications
Using psycholinguistic features for profiling first language of authors
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
N-Gram-Based recognition of threatening tweets
CICLing'13 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing - Volume 2
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A new technique is introduced, linguistic profiling, in which large numbers of counts of linguistic features are used as a text profile, which can then be compared to average profiles for groups of texts. The technique proves to be quite effective for authorship verification and recognition. The best parameter settings yield a False Accept Rate of 8.1% at a False Reject Rate equal to zero for the verification task on a test corpus of student essays, and a 99.4% 2-way recognition accuracy on the same corpus.