Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives
ACL '98 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity
COLING '00 Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews
ACL '02 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
A corpus study of evaluative and speculative language
SIGDIAL '01 Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue - Volume 16
Discovering the Correlation between Stock Time Series and Financial News
WI-IAT '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01
Sentiment analysis of Chinese documents: From sentence to document level
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Disambiguating dynamic sentiment ambiguous adjectives
COLING '10 Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics
Chinese sentence-level sentiment classification based on fuzzy sets
COLING '10 Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters
Predicting the semantic orientation of terms in E-HowNet
ROCLING '11 Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The evaluative character of a word is called its semantic orientation (SO). A positive SO indicates desirability (e.g. Good, Honest) and a negative SO indicates undesirability (e.g., Bad, Ugly). This paper presents a method, based on Turney (2003), for inferring the SO of a word from its statistical association with strongly-polarized words and morphemes in Chinese. It is noted that morphemes are much less numerous than words, and that also a small number of fundamental morphemes may be used in the modified system to great advantage. The algorithm was tested on 1,249 words (604 positive and 645 negative) in a corpus of 34 million words, and was run with 20 and 40 polarized words respectively, giving a high precision (79.96% to 81.05%), but a low recall (45.56% to 59.57%). The algorithm was then run with 20 polarized morphemes, or single characters, in the same corpus, giving a high precision of 80.23% and a high recall of 85.03%. We concluded that morphemes in Chinese, as in any language, constitute a distinct sub-lexical unit which, though small in number, has greater linguistic significance than words, as seen by the significant enhancement of results with a much smaller corpus than that required by Turney.