Describing the strategies used for dealing with email interruptions according to different situational parameters

Authors:
Emma Russell;Lynne Millward Purvis;Adrian Banks
Affiliations:
Department of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom;Department of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom;Department of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Venue:
Computers in Human Behavior
Year:
2007

Citing 5
Cited 1

Interrupts: Just a Minute Never Is

IEEE Software
Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Notification user interfaces
Understanding email interaction increases organizational productivity

Communications of the ACM - Program compaction
Managerial Allocation of Time and Effort: The Effects of Interruptions

Management Science
Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction

Human-Computer Interaction

Interleaving tasks to improve performance: Users maximise the marginal rate of return

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Interruptions research is heavily reliant on a paradigm involving 'enforced interruption'. Email use however constitutes a special form of 'controlled interruption'. As there is no precedent available in the existing literature to describe what strategies people use to deal with 'controlled interruption', an exploratory first study was undertaken using an open-ended interview design. Twenty-eight email users working within UK organisations were asked about how they dealt with email interruptions, when faced with different situational or task parameters. Qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts revealed a wide range of strategies used for dealing with email in general, and for specific situations in particular, with idiosyncratic differences in application. These findings are consistent with the predictions of Action Regulation Theory [Hacker, W. (1985). Activity: A fruitful concept in industrial psychology. In M. Frese, J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal directed behaviour: The concept of action in psychology. London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Chapter 18); The German Journal of Psychology 18(2) (1994) 91-120] - that people select strategies (action programs) for achieving a task according to the specific parameters of the task or goal. However, the findings go further in highlighting the salience of individual differences in underwriting one's choice of strategy (or action program). Further research is required to understand which strategies are linked to effective performance, and how individual differences influence strategic decision making in multi-goal work environments.