On learning and evaluation of decision rules in the context of rough sets

Authors:
S K M Wong;W Ziarko
Affiliations:
Department of Computer Science, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2;Department of Computer Science, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2
Venue:
ISMIS '86 Proceedings of the ACM SIGART international symposium on Methodologies for intelligent systems
Year:
1986

Citing 1
Cited 6

Expressive power of knowledge representation systems

International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

Reasoning about Data - A Rough Set Perspective

RSCTC '98 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing
Supporting E-Learning System with Modified Bayesian Rough Set Model

ISNN 2009 Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Neural Networks: Advances in Neural Networks - Part II
Part of Speech (POS) Tag Sets Reduction and Analysis Using Rough Set Techniques

RSFDGrC '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing
A rough sets approach to the identification and analysis of factors affecting biological control of leafy spurge

Transactions on rough sets VIII
Distance: A more comprehensible perspective for measures in rough set theory

Knowledge-Based Systems
A classification model: syntax and semantics for classification

RSFDGrC'05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing - Volume Part II

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We demonstrate in this paper that the principles of inductive learning can be precisely formulated and hopefully better understood based on the theory of rough sets introduced by Pawlak. We discuss some statistical aspects of evaluating and forming decision rules from examples of expert decisions. We also suggest a method of comparing decision rules inferred by different learning algorithms from the same set of samples.