Robustness of mechanical systems against uncertainties

  • Authors:
  • S. Ghanmi;M. -L. Bouazizi;N. Bouhaddi

  • Affiliations:
  • Nabeul Preparatory Engineering Institute (IPEIN), 8000 M'rezgua, Nabeul, Tunisia;Nabeul Preparatory Engineering Institute (IPEIN), 8000 M'rezgua, Nabeul, Tunisia;FEMTO ST Institute UMR 6174-R. Chaléat Applied Mechanics Laboratory, University of Franche-Comté, 24 Chemin de l'Epitaphe, 25000 Besançon, France

  • Venue:
  • Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper, one can propose a method which takes into account the propagation of uncertainties in the finite element models in a multi-objective optimization procedure. This method is based on the coupling of stochastic response surface method (SRSM) and a genetic algorithm provided with a new robustness criterion. The SRSM is based on the use of stochastic finite element method (SFEM) via the use of the polynomial chaos expansion (PC). Thus, one can avoid the use of Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) whose costs become prohibitive in the optimization problems, especially when the finite element models are large and have a considerable number of design parameters. The objective of this study is on one hand to quantify efficiently the effects of these uncertainties on the responses variability or the cost functions which one wishes to optimize and on the other hand, to calculate solutions which are both optimal and robust with respect to the uncertainties of design parameters. In order to study the propagation of input uncertainties on the mechanical structure responses and the robust multi-objective optimization with respect to these uncertainty, two numerical examples were simulated. The results which relate to the quantification of the uncertainty effects on the responses variability were compared with those obtained by the reference method (REF) using MCS and with those of the deterministic response surfaces methodology (RSM). In the same way, the robust multi-objective optimization results resulting from the SRSM method were compared with those obtained by the direct optimization considered as reference (REF) and with RSM methodology. The SRSM method application to the response variability study and the robust multi-objective optimization gave convincing results.