Feature-guided clustering of multi-dimensional flow cytometry datasets

  • Authors:
  • Qing T. Zeng;Juan Pablo Pratt;Jane Pak;Dino Ravnic;Harold Huss;Steven J. Mentzer

  • Affiliations:
  • Decision Systems Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 310 Thorn Building, 75 Francis Street, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA and Harvard-MIT Division of Human Sciences and Technology ...;Departments of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;Departments of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;Departments of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;Departments of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;Departments of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA and Harvard-MIT Division of Human Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Background: Flow cytometry produces large multi-dimensional datasets of the physical and molecular characteristics of individual cells. The objective of this study was to simplify the cytometry datasets by arranging or clustering ''objects'' (cells) into a smaller number of relatively homogeneous groups (clusters) on the basis of interobject similarities and dissimilarities. Results: The algorithm was designed to be driven by histogram features; that is, the relevant single parameter histogram features were used to guide multidimensional k-means clustering without an a priori estimate of cluster number. To test this approach, we simulated cell-derived datasets using protein-coated microspheres (artificial ''cells''). The microspheres were constructed to provide 119 populations in 40 samples. The feature-guided (FG) approach accurately identified 100% of the predetermined cluster combinations. In contrast, an approach based on the partition index (PI) cluster validity measure accurately identified 83.2% of the clusters. Direct comparisons of the two methods indicated that the FG method was significantly more accurate than PI in identifying both the number of clusters and the number of objects within the clusters (p