Possibilistic mean-variance models and efficient frontiers for portfolio selection problem
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Risk Management with Benchmarking
Management Science
Intradaily dynamic portfolio selection
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Risk-averse production planning
ADT'11 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Algorithmic decision theory
Evaluating Value-at-Risk Models with Desk-Level Data
Management Science
Application of copula and copula-CVaR in the multivariate portfolio optimization
ESCAPE'07 Proceedings of the First international conference on Combinatorics, Algorithms, Probabilistic and Experimental Methodologies
Trading team composition for the intraday multistock market
Decision Support Systems
Journal of Global Optimization
Hi-index | 0.01 |
In this paper, we analyze the portfolio selection implications arising from imposing a value-at-risk (VaR) constraint on the mean-variance model, and compare them with those arising from the imposition of a conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) constraint. We show that for a given confidence level, a CVaR constraint is tighter than a VaR constraint if the CVaR and VaR bounds coincide. Consequently, a CVaR constraint is more effective than a VaR constraint as a tool to control slightly risk-averse agents, but in the absence of a risk-free security, has a perverse effect in that it is more likely to force highly risk-averse agents to select portfolios with larger standard deviations. However, when the CVaR bound is appropriately larger than the VaR bound or when a risk-free security is present, a CVaR constraint "dominates" a VaR constraint as a risk management tool.