Downside Loss Aversion and Portfolio Management

Authors:
Robert Jarrow;Feng Zhao
Affiliations:
Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853;Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey 07102
Venue:
Management Science
Year:
2006

Citing 2
Cited 1

Markowitz Revisited: Mean-Variance Models in Financial Portfolio Analysis

SIAM Review
Feature Article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. Practice

INFORMS Journal on Computing

Individual vs. Aggregate Preferences: The Case of a Small Fish in a Big Pond

Management Science

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Downside loss-averse preferences have seen a resurgence in the portfolio management literature. This is due to the increasing use of derivatives in managing equity portfolios and the increased use of quantitative techniques for bond portfolio management. We employ the lower partial moment as a risk measure for downside loss aversion and compare mean-variance (M-V) and mean-lower partial moment (M-LPM) optimal portfolios under nonnormal asset return distributions. When asset returns are nearly normally distributed, there is little difference between the optimal M-V and M-LPM portfolios. When asset returns are nonnormal with large left tails, we document significant differences in M-V and M-LPM optimal portfolios. This observation is consistent with industry usage of M-V theory for equity portfolios but not for fixed-income portfolios.