Conducting R&D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights Protection

Authors:
Minyuan Zhao
Affiliations:
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 3-365 CarlSMgmt, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Venue:
Management Science
Year:
2006

Citing 4
Cited 5

Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States

Management Science
Imitation of Complex Strategies

Management Science
Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms

Management Science
Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns

Management Science

Component-Based Technology Transfer in the Presence of Potential Imitators

Management Science
On the reliability of software piracy statistics

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal Linkages

Management Science
From Wires to Partners: How the Internet Has Fostered R&D Collaborations Within Firms

Management Science
A Strategic Perspective on IT Outsourcing

International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are increasingly conducting research and development (R&D) in countries such as China and India, where intellectual property rights (IPR) protection is still far from adequate. This paper examines this seemingly puzzling situation. I argue that weak IPR leads to low returns to innovation and underutilization of innovative talents; MNEs that possess alternative mechanisms for protecting their intellectual properties will therefore find it attractive to conduct R&D at those locations. A theoretical framework is developed to capture the interaction between firm strategy and the institutional environment. The empirical analysis on a sample of 1,567 U.S.-headquartered innovating firms finds results consistent with the hypotheses that (i) technologies developed in countries with weak IPR protection are used more internally, and (ii) technologies developed by firms with R&D in weak IPR countries show stronger internal linkages. The results suggest that firms may use internal organizations to substitute for inadequate external institutions. By doing so, they are able to take advantage of the arbitrage opportunities presented by the institutional gap across countries.