Optimal Inventory Policy with Two Suppliers

Authors:
Edward J. Fox;Richard Metters;John Semple
Affiliations:
Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, P.O. Box 750333, Dallas, Texas 75275-0333;Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322-2710;Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, P.O. Box 750333, Dallas, Texas 75275-0333
Venue:
Operations Research
Year:
2006

Citing 1
Cited 6

Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective

Management Science

Optimal Policies for Inventory Systems with Separate Delivery-Request and Order-Quantity Decisions

Operations Research
Inventory, Discounts, and the Timing Effect

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Technical Note---Preservation of Quasi-K-Concavity and Its Applications

Operations Research
Inventory Control with Generalized Expediting

Operations Research
Ordering Policies for Periodic-Review Inventory Systems with Quantity-Dependent Fixed Costs

Operations Research
Technical Note---Optimal Inventory Policy in the Presence of a Long-Term Supplier and a Spot Market

Operations Research

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We analyze a periodic-review inventory model where the decision maker can buy from either of two suppliers. With the first supplier, the buyer incurs a high variable cost but negligible fixed cost; with the second supplier, the buyer incurs a lower variable cost but a substantial fixed cost. Consequently, ordering costs are piecewise linear and concave. We show that a reduced form of generalized (s, S) policy is optimal for both finite and (discounted) infinite-horizon problems, provided that the demand density is log-concave. This condition on the distribution is much less restrictive than in previous models. In particular, it applies to the normal, truncated normal, gamma, and beta distributions, which were previously excluded. We concentrate on the situation in which sales are lost, but explain how the policy, cost assumptions, and proofs can be altered for the case where excess demand is backordered. In the lost sales case, the optimal policy will have one of three possible forms: a base stock policy for purchasing exclusively at the high variable cost (HVC) supplier; an (sLVC, SLVC) policy for buying exclusively from the low variable cost (LVC) supplier; or a hybrid (s, SHVC, SLVC) policy for buying from both suppliers.