The IFAST model, a novel parallel nonlinear EEG analysis technique, distinguishes mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients with high degree of accuracy

  • Authors:
  • Massimo Buscema;Paolo Rossini;Claudio Babiloni;Enzo Grossi

  • Affiliations:
  • Semeion Research Centre, Via Sersale, 117, 00128 Rome, Italy;Associazione Fatebenefratelli per la ricerca, A.Fa.R., Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico "S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli", Via Piastroni, 4 ...;Associazione Fatebenefratelli per la ricerca, A.Fa.R., Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico "S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli", Via Piastroni, 4 ...;Bracco SpA Medical Department, Via E. Folli, 50, 20134 Milan, Italy

  • Venue:
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Objective: This paper presents the results obtained with the innovative use of special types of artificial neural networks (ANNs) assembled in a novel methodology named IFAST (implicit function as squashing time) capable of compressing the temporal sequence of electroencephalographic (EEG) data into spatial invariants. The aim of this study is to assess the potential of this parallel and nonlinear EEG analysis technique in distinguishing between subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with a high degree of accuracy in comparison with standard and advanced nonlinear techniques. The principal aim of the study was testing the hypothesis that automatic classification of MCI and AD subjects can be reasonably correct when the spatial content of the EEG voltage is properly extracted by ANNs. Methods and material: Resting eyes-closed EEG data were recorded in 180 AD patients and in 115 MCI subjects. The spatial content of the EEG voltage was extracted by IFAST step-wise procedure using ANNs. The data input for the classification operated by ANNs were not the EEG data, but the connections weights of a nonlinear auto-associative ANN trained to reproduce the recorded EEG tracks. These weights represented a good model of the peculiar spatial features of the EEG patterns at scalp surface. The classification based on these parameters was binary (MCI versus AD) and was performed by a supervised ANN. Half of the EEG database was used for the ANN training and the remaining half was utilised for the automatic classification phase (testing). Results: The best results distinguishing between AD and MCI reached to 92.33%. The comparative results obtained with the best method so far described in the literature, based on blind source separation and Wavelet pre-processing, were 80.43% (p