An empirical study of the robustness of Windows NT applications using random testing

  • Authors:

  • Justin E. Forrester;Barton P. Miller

  • Affiliations:

  • Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI;Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

  • Venue:
  • WSS'00 Proceedings of the 4th conference on USENIX Windows Systems Symposium - Volume 4
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.02

Visualization

Abstract

We report on the third in a series of studies on the reliability of application programs in the face of random input. In 1990 and 1995, we studied the reliability of UNIX application programs, both command line and X-Window based (GUI). In this study, we apply our testing techniques to applications running on the Windows NT operating system. Our testing is simple black-box random input testing; by any measure, it is a crude technique, but it seems to be effective at locating bugs in real programs. We tested over 30 GUI-based applications by subjecting them to two kinds of random input: (1) streams of valid keyboard and mouse events and (2) streams of random Win32 messages. We have built a tool that helps automate the testing of Windows NT applications. With a few simple parameters, any application can be tested. Using our random testing techniques, our previous UNIX-based studies showed that we could crash a wide variety of command-line and X-window based applications on several UNIX platforms. The test results are similar for NT-based applications. When subjected to random valid input that could be produced by using the mouse and keyboard, we crashed 21% of applications that we tested and hung an additional 24% of applications. When subjected to raw random Win32 messages, we crashed or hung all the applications that we tested. We report which applications failed under which tests, and provide some analysis of the failures.