Fair Π

  • Authors:
  • Diletta Cacciagrano;Flavio Corradini;Catuscia Palamidessi

  • Affiliations:
  • Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Camerino, Italy;Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Camerino, Italy;INRIA Futurs, LIX École Polytechnique, France

  • Venue:
  • Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS)
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper, we define fair computations in the @p-calculus [Milner, R., Parrow, J. & Walker, D., A Calculus of Mobile Processes, Part I and II, Information and Computation 100 (1992) 1-78]. We follow Costa and Stirling's approach for CCS-like languages [Costa, G. & Stirling, C., A Fair Calculus of Communicating Systems, Acta Informatica 21 (1984) 417-441, Costa, G. & Stirling, C., Weak and Strong Fairness in CCS, Information and Computation 73 (1987) 207-244] but exploit a more natural labeling method of process actions to filter out unfair process executions. The new labeling allows us to prove all the significant properties of the original one, such as unicity, persistence and disappearance of labels. It also turns out that the labeled @p-calculus is a conservative extension of the standard one. We contrast the existing fair testing [Brinksma, E., Rensink, A. & Vogler, W., Fair Testing, Proc. of CONCUR'95, LNCS, 962 (1995) 313-327, Natarajan, V. & Cleaveland, R., Divergence and Fair Testing, Proc. of ICALP '95, LNCS, 944 (1995) 648-659] with those that naturally arise by imposing weak and strong fairness as defined by Costa and Stirling. This comparison provides the expressiveness of the various fair testing-based semantics and emphasizes the discriminating power of the one already proposed in the literature.