Performing and Reviewing Assessments of Contemporary Modularization Approaches: What Constitutes Reasonable Expectations?

Authors:
Robert J. Walker
Affiliations:
University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Venue:
ACoM '07 Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques
Year:
2007

Citing 7
Cited 0

Evaluating Emerging Software Development Technologies: Lessons Learned from Assessing Aspect-Oriented Programming

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Meta Analysis—A Silver Bullet—for Meta-Analysts

Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Studies of Object-Oriented Artifacts, Methods,and Processes: State of the Art and Future Directions

Empirical Software Engineering
Should Computer Scientists Experiment More?

Computer
Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Panel: empirical validation: what, why, when, and how

Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The inherent difficulties in assessing contemporary modularization (CoM) approaches are considered. The motivation is provided for a model relating assessment methodologies to the maturity of the CoM approach.