Report on the INEX 2004 interactive track
ACM SIGIR Forum
Is XML retrieval meaningful to users?: searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements
SIGIR '06 Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
IIiX Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context
Relevant contextual features in XML retrieval
IIiX Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context
What do users think of an XML element retrieval system?
INEX'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
Users interaction with the hierarchically structured presentation in XML document retrieval
INEX'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
ECDL'06 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries
The interactive track at INEX 2004
INEX'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
Access to archival material in context
Proceedings of the second international symposium on Information interaction in context
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context
Summarisation of the logical structure of XML documents
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.01 |
The overall motivation for the Interactive Track (iTrack) at INEX is twofold. First, to investigate the behaviour of users when interacting with components of XML documents, and secondly to investigate and develop approaches for XML retrieval which are effective in user-based environments. One of the major outcomes of the track in 2004 was the need to investigate methods that can be supportive during the search process based on features extracted from the XML formatting[1][2]. Problems that might be solved using such methods include overlapping components and the presentation of retrieved elements in the result list. In the experimental system that was offered in 2005, these two issues were addressed. This offered the opportunity to study how overall user search behaviour was affected by these changes when compared to the behaviour observed in 2004. In addition, the following issues were addressed in 2005, following the recommendations of the INEX Methodology Workshop at the Glasgow IR Festival1.