Reliable information retrieval evaluation with incomplete and biased judgements

  • Authors:
  • Stefan Büttcher;Charles L. A. Clarke;Peter C. K. Yeung;Ian Soboroff

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Waterloo;University of Waterloo;University of Waterloo;National Institute of Standards and Technology

  • Venue:
  • SIGIR '07 Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Information retrieval evaluation based on the pooling method is inherently biased against systems that did not contribute to the pool of judged documents. This may distort the results obtained about the relative quality of the systems evaluated and thus lead to incorrect conclusions about the performance of a particular ranking technique. We examine the magnitude of this effect and explore how it can be countered by automatically building an unbiased set of judgements from the original, biased judgements obtained through pooling. We compare the performance of this method with other approaches to the problem of incomplete judgements, such as bpref, and show that the proposed method leads to higher evaluation accuracy, especially if the set of manual judgements is rich in documents, but highly biased against some systems.