Nonlinear effects of the LMS adaptive predictor for chirped input signals

Authors:
Jun Han;James R. Zeidler;Walter H. Ku
Affiliations:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA and Space and Naval Warfare Center, San Diego, CA;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Venue:
EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing
Year:
2002

Citing 7
Cited 0

Adaptive filter theory (3rd ed.)

Adaptive filter theory (3rd ed.)
Performance evaluation of adaptive filtering algorithms for the mobile communication environment

Performance evaluation of adaptive filtering algorithms for the mobile communication environment
Sinusoidal interference rejection analysis of an LMS adaptivefeedforward controller with a noisy periodic reference

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Adaptive recovery of a chirped signal using the RLS algorithm

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Non-Wiener solutions for the LMS algorithm-a time domain approach

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Nonlinear effects in LMS adaptive equalizers

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
A performance bound for the LMS estimator

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper investigates the nonlinear effects of the Least Mean Square (LMS) adaptive predictor. Traditional analysis of the adaptive filter ignores the statistical dependence among successive tap-input vectors and bounds the performance of the adaptive filter by that of the finite-length Wiener filter. It is shown that the nonlinear effects make it possible for an adaptive transversal prediction filter to significantly outperform the finite-length Wiener predictor. An approach is derived to approximate the total steady-state Mean Square Error (MSE) for LMS adaptive predictors with stationary or chirped input signals. This approach shows that, while the nonlinear effect is small for the one-step LMS adaptive predictor, it increases in magnitude as the prediction distance is increased. We also show that the nonlinear effect of the LMS adaptive predictor is more significant than that of the Recursive Least Square adaptive predictor.