A comparison of machine learning techniques for phishing detection

  • Authors:
  • Saeed Abu-Nimeh;Dario Nappa;Xinlei Wang;Suku Nair

  • Affiliations:
  • Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX;Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX;Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX;Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the anti-phishing working groups 2nd annual eCrime researchers summit
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.02

Visualization

Abstract

There are many applications available for phishing detection. However, unlike predicting spam, there are only few studies that compare machine learning techniques in predicting phishing. The present study compares the predictive accuracy of several machine learning methods including Logistic Regression (LR), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), and Neural Networks (NNet) for predicting phishing emails. A data set of 2889 phishing and legitimate emails is used in the comparative study. In addition, 43 features are used to train and test the classifiers.