Does the XP environment meet the motivational needs of the software developer? An empirical study

Authors:
Sarah Beecham;Helen Sharp;Nathan Baddoo;Tracy Hall;Hugh Robinson
Affiliations:
University of Hertfordshire, UK;The Open University, Walton Hall, MK7 6AA, UK;University of Hertfordshire, UK;University of Hertfordshire, UK;University of Hertfordshire, UK
Venue:
AGILE '07 Proceedings of the AGILE 2007
Year:
2007

Citing 0
Cited 6

Exploring motivational differences between software developers and project managers

Proceedings of the the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
Exploring motivational differences between software developers and project managers

The 6th Joint Meeting on European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on the foundations of software engineering: companion papers
Collaboration and co-ordination in mature eXtreme programming teams

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Required level of motivation to revitalize the workforce in software industry of Pakistan

SEPADS'08 Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems
A framework to identify the 'Motivational Factors' of employees: a case study of Pakistan IT industry

WSEAS Transactions on Computers
Developer-driven big-bang process transition from Scrum to Kanban

Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Software and Systems Process

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper examines how XP practice meets the motivational needs of software developers. Interactions with peers have been identified by others as one potential area of (de)motivation but little detail is known. The nature of this motivator, as expressed by software developers themselves, was explored through semi-structured interviews with a high maturity high performing team working on safety critical software applications in a traditional environment. From these interviews, we have identified seven themes which are characteristic indicators of peer motivation. We interrogate observational data from five mature XP teams to consider whether and how these characteristic indicators are present in an XP environment. We find that XP teams in our study had processes in place that supported many of the motivational needs voiced by developers coming from a traditional, heavyweight software development environment. However, the XP environment is at odds with other motivational needs.