A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. document selection
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
The concept of relevance in IR
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
How users assess web pages for information seeking
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users
Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval
MM '09 Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia
The role of subjective factors in the information search process
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Using a concept map to evaluate exploratory search
Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
KICSS'10 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Knowledge, information, and creativity support systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The article discusses two instant measures of affective value of information objects: Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) and Experienced Utility (EU). The potential utility of these measures for information retrieval research is positioned within a broader discussion of distinctions between instant utility and remembered utility and their relationship to immediate as opposed to retrospective subjective evaluations. The paper describes an approach for obtaining instant WTP and EU ratings in document evaluation in contexts of information search and thereafter reports results from a usability study of its implementation. Participants encountered no difficulties in use of the design format and in rating documents using WTP and EU measures. Although two measures were found statistically significantly correlated with each other, participants in the usability study offered different reasons for the ratings of WTP and EU made for the same document.