gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Graphical notations, narratives and persuasion: a Pliant Systems approach to Hypertext Tool Design
Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
Ontology mapping: the state of the art
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Semantic blogging and decentralized knowledge management
Communications of the ACM - The Blogosphere
Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web
Towards an argument interchange format
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Modelling discourse in contested domains: a semiotic and cognitive framework
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web
Artificial Intelligence
Abstract Argumentation Scheme Frameworks
AIMSA '08 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Flexible concept-based argumentation in dynamic scenes
KI'10 Proceedings of the 33rd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence
A heuristics-based pruning technique for argumentation trees
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
Review: representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Enabling Large-Scale Deliberation Using Attention-Mediation Metrics
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Communications of the ACM
Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.02 |
The World Wide Web (WWW) can be seen as an ideal platform for enhancing argumentative expression and communication, due to its ubiquity and openness. Much argumentation takes place on personal blogs and on unstructured or semi-structured discussion forums. Recently, an increasing number of Web 2.0 applications provide specific support for large-scale socially-contributed argumentative content. When compared with traditional methods of Web discourse, these tools enable better visualisation, navigation and analysis of the 'state of the debate' by participants and, potentially, by automated tools. In this paper, I outline some potential benefits of Semantic Web techniques in supporting mass-scale, socially-contributed argument tagging. I also present some recent research in this direction.