Checkers' No-Harm Alarms and Design Approaches to Tolerate Them

Authors:
Daniele Rossi;Martin Omaña;Cecilia Metra
Affiliations:
D.E.I.S. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 40136;D.E.I.S. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 40136;D.E.I.S. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 40136
Venue:
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
Year:
2008

Citing 8
Cited 0

Systematic Unidirectional Error-Detecting Codes

IEEE Transactions on Computers
Fault-tolerant computing: theory and techniques; vol. 1

Fault-tolerant computing: theory and techniques; vol. 1
Strongly Code Disjoint Checkers

IEEE Transactions on Computers
IBM experiments in soft fails in computer electronics (1978–1994)

IBM Journal of Research and Development - Special issue: terrestrial cosmic rays and soft errors
Model for Transient Fault Susceptibility of Combinational Circuits

Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
On the Selection of Unidirectional Error Detecting Codes for Self-Checking Circuits' Area Overhead and Performance Optimization

IOLTS '05 Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium
Multiple Transient Faults in Logic: An Issue for Next Generation ICs

DFT '05 Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems
Checker No-Harm Alarm Robustness

IOLTS '06 Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on On-Line Testing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the probability that transient faults, multiple or single, affecting a checker of a self-checking circuit (with particular reference to the case of circuits using the two-rail code, the parity code, the Berger code and the Bose---Lin code) give rise to no-harm alarms, here defined as indications of errors neither denoting the presence of an incorrect word at the output of the functional block, nor denoting the presence of checker internal faults possibly compromising its ability to discriminate input codewords from input non-codewords. Differently from all other error indications, no-harm alarms could be conveniently ignored (or tolerated) by the system, with no need to adopt any recovery strategy upon their reception, otherwise for instance leading to exclude the self checking circuit from the whole system, or to degrade system's performance. A new property (No-Harm Alarm Robustness) is defined for checkers, allowing to discriminate "true" error indications from no-harm alarms. A possible approach to design checkers featuring such a property is proposed. The behavior of the derived checkers has been verified by means of electrical level simulations, and their costs are discussed.