The case for case studies of programming problems
Communications of the ACM
Experiences with CLARE: a computer-supported collaborative learning environment
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Towards and analytical framework for CSCdistanceL
CSCL '95 The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
A first step to formally evaluate collaborative work
GROUP '97 Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work: the integration challenge
Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies
CSCW '98 Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Evaluating Cooperation in Group Work
CRIWG '00 Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Groupware
The cognitive skill of coaching collaboration
CSCL '99 Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving
CSCL '99 Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
CSCL '05 Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!
A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL
CSCL '05 Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!
An Integrated Framework for Fine-Grained Analysis and Design of Group Learning Activities
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Learning by Effective Utilization of Technologies: Facilitating Intercultural Understanding
International Journal of Knowledge and Web Intelligence
CRIWG'06 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Groupware: design, implementation, and use
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Understanding and analysing collaborative learning processes requires a fine-grained sequential analysis of the group interaction in the context of learning goals. Several researchers in the area of cooperative work take the quality of the group outcome as a success criterion. Nevertheless, recent findings are giving importance to the quality of the cooperation process itself. This paper presents a set of indicators the main objective of which is to evaluate the collaborative learning process. In this paper, our aim is to present a method, which can be used in analysing the interaction processes in a CSCL environment. We have defined an experiment to gather data from groups working on a simple task. These data are then used to build some cooperation indicators, which in turn allow us to estimate the quality of the work process.