Applied multivariate techniques
Applied multivariate techniques
Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model
Communications of the ACM
Process assessment considered wasteful
Communications of the ACM
Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling
MIS Quarterly
Measuring Process Consistency: Implications for Reducing Software Defects
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
The Internal Consistencies of the 1987 SEI Maturity Questionnaireand the SPICE Capability Dimension
Empirical Software Engineering
A Critical Look at Software Capability Evaluations
IEEE Software
IEEE Software
The Internal Consistency of the ISO/IEC 15504 Software Process Capability Scale
METRICS '98 Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics
Cost Implications of Interrater Agreement for Software Process Assessments
METRICS '98 Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics
SPICE: an empiricist's perspective
ISESS '95 Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Software Engineering Standards Symposium
The effects of software process maturity on software development effort
The effects of software process maturity on software development effort
Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet?
MIS Quarterly
Information and Software Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Evaluating the reliability of maturity level (ML) ratings is crucial for providing confidence in the results of software process assessments. This study investigates the dimensions underlying the maturity construct in the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) for Software (SW-CMM) and estimates the internal consistency of each dimension. The results suggest that SW-CMM maturity is a three-dimensional construct, with "Project Implementation" representing the ML 2 key process areas (KPAs), "Organization Implementation" representing the ML 3 KPAs, and "Quantitative Process Implementation" representing the KPAs at MLs 4 and 5. The internal consistency for each of the three dimensions as estimated by Cronbach's alpha exceeds the recommended value of 0.9. Based on those results, this study builds and tests a theoretical model which posits that the achievement of lower ML KPAs sustains the implementation of higher ML KPAs. Results of path analysis using partial least squares (PLS) support the theoretical model and provide detailed understanding of the process improvement path. The analysis is based on 676 CMM-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) assessments.