Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Hirsch index rankings require scaling and higher moment
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Journal of Information Science
An impact indicator for researchers
Scientometrics
The inconsistency of the h-index
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
The Hirsch index and related impact measures
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
A citation index with allowance for the implicit diffusion of scientific knowledge
Scientific and Technical Information Processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article studies the h-index (Hirsch index) and the g-index of authors, in case one counts authorship of the cited articles in a fractional way. There are two ways to do this: One counts the citations to these papers in a fractional way or one counts the ranks of the papers in a fractional way as credit for an author. In both cases, we define the fractional h- and g-indexes, and we present inequalities (both upper and lower bounds) between these fractional h- and g-indexes and their corresponding unweighted values (also involving, of course, the coauthorship distribution). Wherever applicable, examples and counterexamples are provided. In a concrete example (the publication citation list of the present author), we make explicit calculations of these fractional h- and g-indexes and show that they are not very different from the unweighted ones. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.