The influence of effects and phenomena on citations: a comparative analysis of four citation perspectives

Authors:
Qiang Wu;Dietmar Wolfram
Affiliations:
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China 230026 and School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, USA 5 ...;School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, USA 53201
Venue:
Scientometrics
Year:
2011

Citing 5
Cited 1

Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motives

Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Does citation reflect social structure?: longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Citation analysis

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Growth dynamics of citations of cumulative papers of individual authors according to progressive nucleation mechanism: Concept of citation acceleration

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This article defines different perspectives for citations and introduces four concepts: Self-expected Citations, Received Citations, Expected Citations, and Deserved Citations. When comparing permutations of these four classes of perspectives, there are up to 145 kinds of equality/inequality relations. From these numerous relations, we analyze the difference between the Matthew Effect and the Matthew Phenomenon. We provide a precise definition and point out that many previous empirical research studies on the Matthew Effect based on citations belong primarily to the Matthew Phenomenon, and not the true meaning of the Matthew Effect. Due to the difficulty in determining the Deserved Citations, the Matthew Effect is in itself difficult to measure, although it is commonly believed to influence citation counts. Furthermore, from the theoretical facts, we outline four new effects/phenomena: the Self-confidence Effect/Phenomenon, the Narcissus Effect/Phenomenon, the Other-confidence Effect/Phenomenon, and the Flattery Effect/Phenomenon, and we discuss additional influencing factors.