Dissimilarity-based classification of chromatographic profiles

  • Authors:
  • António V. Sousa;Ana Maria Mendonça;Aurélio Campilho

  • Affiliations:
  • Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino Almeida, 431, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal and Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Edif. I &# ...;Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Edif. I – poente, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal and Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Engenharia, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, ...;Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Edif. I – poente, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal and Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Engenharia, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, ...

  • Venue:
  • Pattern Analysis & Applications - Special Issue: Non-parametric distance-based classification techniques and their applications
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper proposes a non-parametric method for the classification of thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) images from patterns represented in a dissimilarity space. Each pattern corresponds to a mixture of Gaussian approximation of the intensity profile. The methodology comprises various phases, including image processing and analysis steps to extract the chromatographic profiles and a classification phase to discriminate among two groups, one corresponding to normal cases and the other to three pathological classes. We present an extensive study of several dissimilarity-based approaches analysing the influence of the dissimilarity measure and the prototype selection method on the classification performance. The main conclusions of this paper are that, Match and Profile-difference dissimilarity measures present better results, and a new prototype selection methodology achieves a performance similar or even better than conventional methods. Furthermore, we also concluded that simplest classifiers, such as k-NN and linear discriminant classifiers (LDCs), present good performance being the overall classification error less than 10% for the four-class problem.