Searchers' relevance judgments and criteria in evaluating web pages in a learning style perspective

  • Authors:

  • Chariste Papaeconomou;Annemarie F. Zijlema;Peter Ingwersen

  • Affiliations:

  • Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen S, Denmark;Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen S, Denmark;Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen S, Denmark

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the second international symposium on Information interaction in context
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a case study of searcher's relevance criteria used for assessments of Web pages in a perspective of learning style. 15 test persons participated in the experiments based on two simulated work tasks that provided cover stories to trigger their information needs. Two learning styles were examined: Global and Sequential learners. The study applied eye-tracking for the observation of relevance hot spots on Web pages, learning style index analysis and post-search interviews to gain more in-depth information on relevance behavior. Findings reveal that with respect to use of graded relevance scores and number of relevance criteria applied per task and test person there are no significant difference between the different styles. Although there differences are detected in the use of relevance criteria between Global and Sequential learners during assessments, they are statistically insignificant. When interviewed in retrospective the resulting profiles tend to become even similar across learning styles but a shift occurs from instant assessments with content features of web pages replacing topicality judgments as predominant relevance criteria.