Exploiting Rough Argumentation in an Online Dispute Resolution Mediator

Authors:
Ioan Alfred Letia;Adrian Groza
Affiliations:
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Computer Science, Baritiu 28, RO-400391 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Computer Science, Baritiu 28, RO-400391 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Venue:
RSEISP '07 Proceedings of the international conference on Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms
Year:
2007

Citing 8
Cited 0

Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification

Artificial Intelligence
An algorithm for the induction of defeasible logic theories from databases

ADC '03 Proceedings of the 14th Australasian database conference - Volume 17
Law and defeasibility

Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
The appropriate role of dispute resolution in building trust online

Artificial Intelligence and Law - Online dispute resolution
Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution

Artificial Intelligence and Law - Online dispute resolution
Communication between agents with heterogeneous perceptual capabilities

Information Fusion
Rough intervals---enhancing intervals for qualitative modeling of technical systems

Artificial Intelligence
Introducing a rule importance measure

Transactions on Rough Sets V

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Online dispute resolution is becoming the main method when dealing with a conflict in e-commerce. Our framework exploits the argumentation semantics of defeasible logic, shown to be a suitable choice for legal reasoning. We introduce the rough set theory within defeasible logic for handling the gradual information revealed in a legal dispute. The rough sets are being used in the generation of defeasible theories from available cases, but also in the inference rules required for the argumentation process. The framework can cover both aspects of the law: case based reasoning and legal syllogism.