Philosophical foundations of deontic logic and the logic of defeasible conditionals
Deontic logic in computer science
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
Exploiting Rough Argumentation in an Online Dispute Resolution Mediator
RSEISP '07 Proceedings of the international conference on Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms
Structured argumentation in a mediator for online dispute resolution
DALT'07 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Declarative agent languages and technologies V
A model of juridical acts: part 1:: the world of law
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The paper consists of three parts. In the first part five kinds of defeasibility are distinguished that is ontological, conceptual, epistemic, justification and logical defeasibility. In the second part it is argued that from these, justification defeat is the phenomenon that plays a role in legal reasoning. In the third part, the view is defended that non-monotonic logics are not necessary to model justification defeat, but that they are so to speak the natural way to model this phenomenon.