Safety Hazard Identification by Misuse Cases: Experimental Comparison of Text and Diagrams

  • Authors:
  • Tor Stålhane;Guttorm Sindre

  • Affiliations:
  • Dept of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian Univ of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway NO-7491;Dept of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian Univ of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway NO-7491

  • Venue:
  • MoDELS '08 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In general, diagrams and text are both considered to have their advantages and disadvantages for the representation of use case models, but this is rarely investigated experimentally. This paper describes a controlled experiment where we compare safety hazard identification by means of misuse cases based on use case diagrams and textual use cases. The experiment participants found use case diagrams and textual use cases equally easy to use. In most cases those who used textual use cases were able to identify more failure modes or threats. The main reason for this seems to be that use cases encourage analysts to specifically focus on threats related to the functions mentioned in the use case, and textual use cases include more functional details than diagrams. The focus is decided by information in each use case which will thus decide the number of threats identified.