Computational Intelligence: An Introduction
Computational Intelligence: An Introduction
Computational Intelligence: The Experts Speak
Computational Intelligence: The Experts Speak
Mathematical fuzzy logic as a tool for the treatment of vague information
Information Sciences—Informatics and Computer Science: An International Journal
Emergent Information Technologies and Enabling Policies for Counter-Terrorism (IEEE Press Series on Computational Intelligence)
Adversarial Reasoning: Computational Approaches to Reading the Opponent's Mind
Adversarial Reasoning: Computational Approaches to Reading the Opponent's Mind
Editorial: On fundamentals of fuzzy logic and soft computing and some applications
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Fuzzy measures and integrals in evaluation of strategies
Information Sciences: an International Journal
A knowledge-based approach to adversarial decision making: Research Articles
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
On heuristics as a fundamental constituent of soft computing
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
New decision-making techniques and their application in the selection of financial products
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Theoretical analysis of expected payoff in an adversarial domain
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Two machine-learning techniques for mining solutions of the ReleasePlannerTM decision support system
Information Sciences: an International Journal
| Hi-index | 0.07 |
Adversarial decision making is aimed at determining optimal strategies against an adversarial and adaptive opponent. One defense against this intrusion into our cognitive process is to make decisions that are intended to confuse the observer, although our rewards can be diminished. In this work, we propose a mathematical framework that allows studying the balance between inducing confusion and attaining payoff in adversarial decision making. Computational experiments are performed to evaluate how the payoff and the number of correct predictions are affected by the strategies selected for each participant and by the number of decisions available.