Prudent Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
ICTAI '05 Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argumentation semantics
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
An axiomatic account of formal argumentation
AAAI'05 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
Artificial Intelligence
Evaluating argumentation semantics with respect to skepticism adequacy
ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Computational Complexity of Semi-stable Semantics in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
JELIA '08 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
On the complexity of computing the justification status of an argument
TAFA'11 Proceedings of the First international conference on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
A semantics for dynamic argumentation frameworks
ArgMAS'11 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper, we contribute to this kind of analysis by providing a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics) using both a weak and a strong skepticism relation.