ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Coherence in finite argument systems
Artificial Intelligence
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Prudent Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
ICTAI '05 Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Argument theory change applied to defeasible logic programming
AAAI'08 Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Argumentation system with changes of an agent's knowledge base
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Argumentation system allowing suspend/resume of an argumentation line
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents a semantics for dynamic argumentation frameworks. A dynamic argumentation system involves the concept of execution of an argumentation affecting subsequent arguments. Although such dynamic treatment is necessary to grasp the behavior of actual argumentation, semantics proposed to date can only handle the static aspects. Here, we present a new semantics that fits dynamic argumentation. We discuss what properties hold and explain how to compute changes in the set of acceptable arguments, depending on the presentation order of arguments.